NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal CITATION : R v Greenham [1999] NSWCCA 8 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60561/97 HEARING DATE(S) : 1/12/98 JUDGMENT DATE : 8 March 1999
PARTIES : Gregory Glenn Greenham (Appellant) Regina (Respondent) JUDGMENT OF : Sheller JA at 1; Dowd J at 2; Hidden J at 3
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 97/31/0186 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER : Coolahan ADCJ
COUNSEL : G P Craddock (Appellant) L M B Lamprati (Respondent) SOLICITORS : Jeffreys & Associates (Appellant) S E O'Connor (Respondent) CATCHWORDS : Criminal Law - aggravated indecent assault - adequacy of directions about evidence of sexual conduct other than that charged - need for warning about complainant's evidence - adequacy of directions about delayed complaint - discretion to decline to order new trial. Crimes Act 1900 ACTS CITED : Evidence Act 1995 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Evidence Act 1995 M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487 R v AH (1997) 42 NSWLR 702 R v Fraser (CCA unreported 10 August 1998) R v Beserick (1993) 30 NSWLR 510 R v Wickham (CCA unreported 17 December 1991 CASES CITED: R v Beattie (1996) 40 NSWLR 155 R v Stanton (CCA unreported 24 July 1998 Crofts v The Queen (1996) 186 CLR 427 R v Johnston (CCA unreported 31 July 1998) Graham v The Queen (1998) 157 ALR 404 Fleming v The Queen (1998) 158 ALR 379 DECISION : Appeal allowed - on each count conviction quashed, verdict and judgment of acquittal entered
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate