NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : [1999] 33 ACSR 416
New South Wales Supreme Court CITATION : Australian Stock Exchange Limited v Hudson Securities Pty Limited [1999] NSWSC 1237 CURRENT JURISDICTION : Equity FILE NUMBER(S) : 4688/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 7/12/1999 JUDGMENT DATE : 15 December 1999
PARTIES : Australian Stock Exchange Limited (ACN 008 624 691) (Plaintiff) Hudson Securities Pty Limited (ACN 073 633 664) (Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Santow J
COUNSEL : J Griffiths (Plaintiff) A G Hartnell (Sol) (Defendant) SOLICITORS : Johnson Winter & Slattery (Plaintiff) Atanaskovic Hartnell (Defendant) CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS — Stock Exchange — Interpretation of its Business Rules particularly Rule 13.1(1) dealing with ASX investigations — Is the basis for legal adviser and others from Participating Organisation to be present an implied requirement of procedural fairness — Rules of procedural fairness and Business Rule 13.1(1) must accommodate requirement that such presence not prejudice integrity of the investigation — Meaning of that expression — Necessity and justification for implied term to that effect — Public purpose of business rules of ASX and in particular investigation regime in Rule 13.1(1) derived from Pt 7.2 of the Corporations Law and constitution of ASX — Power of ASX to impose undertakings of confidentiality as condition of presence where necessary to avoid prejudice to integrity of investigation — Effect of presence of senior executive in inhibiting answers by interviewee — Scope of Rule 13.1(1) in relation to a potential shadow director being managing director of parent of Participating Organisation. ACTS CITED : Corporations Law s109H, s769A(1), s770, s772A, s774 s777 and s1114, Pt 7.2, Division 10 of Pt 1.2 Australian Securities Commission v Bell (1991) 6 ACSR 281 BP Refinery (Western Port) Pty Limited v Hastings Shire Council (1977) 16 ALR 363 Macquarie Advisory Group Pty Ltd (Receiver appointed) & Ors v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (1999) 33 ACSR 106 CASES CITED : National Companies and Securities Commission v Bankers Trust Australia Ltd & Ors (1989) 24 FCR 217 (Full Federal Court) NCSC v News Corporation Ltd [1984] 156 CLR 296 Shaw Stockbroking v Australian Stock Exchange Ltd (1998) 26 ACSR 702 Stanham v The National Trust of Australia (NSW) (1989) 15 ACL 87 DECISION : ASX permitted to impose undertakings to preserve confidentiality of investigative information.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate