NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court CITATION : Tamone v How Fast Pty Limited [1999] NSWSC 570 CURRENT JURISDICTION : Equity FILE NUMBER(S) : 1826/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 31/05/99, 07/06/99, 08/06/99 JUDGMENT DATE : 8 June 1999
PARTIES : Mary Tamone and Frank Tamone (Ps) How Fast Pty Limited (in liquidation) (ACN 056 912 237) (D) JUDGMENT OF : Santow J
COUNSEL : J K Chippindall (P) ex party SOLICITORS : Astridge & Murray (P) CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS — Extension of time to register a charge under s262 of the Corporations Law — Relevant considerations where corporation goes into administration and then liquidation — No invariable rule that dispensation should be precluded. ACTS CITED : Corporations Law s262(1)(a); s262(1)(b)(i); s266(4) J J Leonard Properties v Leonard (WA) Pty Ltd (in liq) No. 2 (1988) 13 ACLR 77 CASES CITED : Morris v Woodings & Anor (1997) 25 ACSR 636 Sanwa Australia Finance Limited v Ground-Breakers Pty Limited (in liquidation) (1989-90) 2 ACSR 692 Vector Capital Limited v SNS Software Network Systems Pty Limited (1988) 12 NSWLR 1 DECISION : Application to extend time for registration of charge granted.
Tamone.8June99 — 9 June, 1999: Tamone v How Fast Pty Limited (in liquidation) 7 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES IN EQUITY
SANTOW J
No. 1826/99 In the matter of HOW FAST PTY LIMITED (in liquidation) (ACN 056 912 237) and the Corporations Law MARY TAMONE & FRANK TAMONE Plaintiffs HOW FAST PTY LIMITED (in liquidation) (ACN 056 912 237) Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate