NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 48 NSWLR 249 110 LGERA 371
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : WATER ADMINISTRATION MINISTERIAL CORPORATION v MILLS ENGSTA PTY LTD v MILLS [2000] NSWCA 194 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40651/99; 40653/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 26 June 2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 28 July 2000
PARTIES : WATER ADMINISTRATION MINISTERIAL CORPORATION v MILLS & ORS ENGSTA PTY LTD v MILLS & ORS JUDGMENT OF : Mason P at 1; Meagher JA at 59; Powell JA at 60
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Land & Environment Court LOWER COURT 30162/97 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Bignold J JUDICIAL OFFICER :
Appellant: P McClellan QC/M Hadley (Water Administration) COUNSEL : Appellant: W Davison SC/P Clay/A Pearman (Engsta) Respondents:F Donohoe Appellant: Paul Percival Esq, Director Legal Services, Department Land & Water Conservation (Water Admin) SOLICITORS : Appellant: McIntosh, McPhilamy & Co (Engsta) Respondents: Callachor & Helby CATCHWORDS : Water and watercourses - control of works on river banks and flood plains - s171(1)(a) and s174(2)(a) Water Act 1912 - controlled work having proscribed effect - scope of the power to approve controlled works - conditional or unconditional approval - conditions which may be imposed - (D). DECISION : Appeal upheld.
THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40651/99 CA 40653/99 MASON P MEAGHER JA POWELL JA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate