NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal CITATION : R v Owen [1999] NSWCCA 133 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60524/98 HEARING DATE(S) : 1 March 1999 JUDGMENT DATE : 4 June 1999
PARTIES : Christopher William Owen (Appellant) Regina (Respondent) JUDGMENT OF : Grove J at 1; Dunford J at 2; Greg James J at 44
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 98/11/0105 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER : Pain DCJ
COUNSEL : GJL Scragg (Appellant) LMB Lamprati (Respondent/Crown) SOLICITORS : Leo & Morrison (Appellant) SE O'Connor (Respondent/Crown) CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - Appeal against conviction - Whether verdicts unreasonable &/or not supported by the evidence - CRIMINAL LAW - Multiple counts - Whether verdicts inconsistent - Apparent error as to dates of count on which appellant acquitted - CRIMINAL LAW - Acts of indecency & sexual assault. ACTS CITED : Crimes Act 1900, ss 81A, 81 Criminal Appeal Act 1912, s 6(1) Fleming v The Queen (1998) 158 ALR 379. R v Giam [1999] NSWCCA 53. M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487. CASES CITED: Penney v The Queen (1998) 155 ALR 605. R v Murray (1987) 11 NSWLR 12. Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298. R v Buckland [1977] 2 NSWLR 452. Dilosa v Latec Finance Pty Ltd (1966) 84 WN (Pt 1) (NSW) 557. DECISION : Appeal dismissed, convictions affirmed.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 60524/98
GROVE J DUNFORD J GREG JAMES J
4 JUNE 1999 REGINA v CHRISTOPHER WILLIAM OWEN
JUDGMENT
1 GROVE J: I agree with Dunford J.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 60524/98
GROVE J DUNFORD J GREG JAMES J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate