NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court CITATION : Obeid v Australian Broadcasting Corporation & 3 Ors [1999] NSWSC 1058 CURRENT JURISDICTION : Common Law FILE NUMBER(S) : 14069 of 1992 HEARING DATE(S) : 28 October 1998 JUDGMENT DATE : 27 October 1999
EDWARD OBEID (Plaintiff)
v
AUSTRALIAN BROADCASTING CORPORATION (First Defendant) PARTIES : JOE KHOURY (Second Defendant)
SAYED OBEID (Third Defendant)
JOE KHOURY and KINSARVA PTY LIMITED ACN 000 554 665 t/as AL BAIRAK NEWSPAPER (Fourth Defendants) JUDGMENT OF : Levine J
D Caspersonn (Plaintiff)
COUNSEL : M Sexton (First Defendant)
J Gibson (Second, Third & Fourth Defendants) McClellands (Plaintiff)
Michael Martin SOLICITORS : Australian Broadcasting Corporation (First Defendant)
Tony Lazaropoulos (Second, Third & Fourth Defendants) CATCHWORDS : Imputations - form - publication - particularisation DECISION : See paragraph 18
DLJ: 3 THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION DEFAMATION LIST No. 14069 of 1992
JUSTICE DAVID LEVINE
WEDNESDAY 27 OCTOBER 1999
EDWARD OBEID (Plaintiff)
v
AUSTRALIAN BROADCASTING CORPORATION (First Defendant)
JOE KHOURY (Second Defendant) SAYED OBEID (Third Defendant)
JOE KHOURY and KINSARVA PTY LIMITED ACN 000 554 665 t/as AL BAIRAK NEWSPAPER (Fourth Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate