NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : [1999] Aust Torts Reports 81-500
New South Wales Supreme Court CITATION : TC v State of New South Wales [1999] NSWSC 31 revised - 26/03/99 CURRENT JURISDICTION : Common Law FILE NUMBER(S) : 11844/93 HEARING DATE(S) : 14/10/97-04/11/97; 19/11/97; 28/11/97; 02/12/97; 09/12/97; 27/01/98-06/02/98; 13/02/98; 05/03/98; 11/03/98; 22/06/98-25/06/98; 29/06/98-17/07/98; 22/07/98; 03/08/98-12/08/98; 20/08/98-21/08/98; 06/10/98-16/10/98 JUDGMENT DATE : 11 February 1999
PARTIES : TC by his tutor Kris Sabatino (Plaintiff) State of New South Wales (Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Studdert J
COUNSEL : A.B. Shand QC/R.R.I. Harper (Plaintiff) F.S. McAlary QC/G.W. Moore (Defendant) SOLICITORS : Heidtman & Co (Plaintiff) Crown Solicitor (Defendant) CATCHWORDS : Tort; Action in negligence; Claim by child in respect of negligence alleged against officers of YACS in failing to respond appropriately to complaints that concerned his welfare; Whether duty of care actionable in negligence, and if so whether there was any breach of such duty Child Welfare Act 1939 Family Law Act ACTS CITED : 1975 Children Act 1989 (Eng) Ombudsman Act Children Services Act (Qld) DECISION : See para 552
I N D E X
Paragraph Number
The cause of action outlined 11-14 TC's family history 15-28 The involvement of YACS 29-38 Sexual abuse: the evidence assessed 39-93 Was there a duty of care in YACS capable of founding a private cause of action? 94-191 The reliability of HF and HM as witnesses 192-213 HF 193-208 HM 209-213 Complaints of ill treatment of TC and the responses by YACS 214-382 Pre February 1983 214-229 Affidavits and other material produced in February/ March 1983 230-267 Assessment by this Court of material as to alleged physical abuse of TC 268-276 Complaints as to scratches in March and May 1983 277-297 The period from mid 1983 until May 1984 reviewed 298-317 The May 1984 notification of sexual abuse and the response by YACS 318-382 Bias 383-474 Mr Male 385-388 Mr Finch 389-392 Mr Hanrahan 393-397 Mrs Burgess 398-412 John Banks 413-416 T. Long 417-418 Mr Langshaw 419-422 Mr Lungley 423-427 Mr Heagney 428-430 Mr Shelston 431-433 Ms Withers 434-436 Mr Callaghan 437-442 Ms Boulter 443-474 The expert evidence considered 475-504 Delay in relation to Dr Waters 505-518 The negligence alleged against the various officers of YACS 519-545 Mr Plater 520 Mr Hulbert 521 Mr Finch 522-523 Mrs Burgess 524-525 Mr Hanrahan 526 Mr Langshaw 527-530 Mr Lungley 531 Mr Callaghan 532-534 Ms Boulter 535-536 Mr Heagney and Mr Croke 537 Ms Ralston and Ms Withers 538-544 The Department 545 Conclusions 546-551 Findings and formal orders 552
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate