NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court CITATION : Marsden v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Limited [1999] NSWSC 259 CURRENT JURISDICTION : Common Law FILE NUMBER(S) : 20223 of 1995; 20592 of 1996 HEARING DATE(S) : 25 March 1999 JUDGMENT DATE : 25 March 1999
JOHN MARSDEN (Plaintiff)
v PARTIES : AMALGAMATED TELEVISION SERVICES PTY LIMITED (Defendant)
NEW SOUTH WALES POLICE SERVICE (On supboena) JUDGMENT OF : Levine J
I Barker Q.C. G Reynolds S.C. R McHugh (Plaintiff)
COUNSEL : W H Nicholas Q.C. J S Wheelhouse R Titterton (Defendant)
P Singleton (Crown Solicitors Office) Phillips Fox (Plaintiff)
SOLICITORS : Mallesons Stephen Jacques (Defendant)
Crown Solicitors Office (New South Wales Police Service) CATCHWORDS : Evidence Act 1995 s 125 - on suggestion of a "furtherance of an abuse of power" ACTS CITED : Evidence Act, 1995 DECISION : See paragraph 22
DLJT: 28 (Ex Tempore - Revised) THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION DEFAMATION LIST No. 20223 of 1995 No. 20592 of 1996
JUSTICE DAVID LEVINE
THURSDAY 25 MARCH 1999
JOHN MARSDEN (Plaintiff)
v
AMALGAMATED TELEVISION SERVICES PTY LIMITED ACN 000 145 246 (Defendant) JUDGMENT ( Evidence Act, 1995 s 125 - on suggestion of a "furtherance of an abuse of power ")
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate