NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal CITATION : Kirkland v Moore & Anor [1999] NSWCA 305 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40524/97 HEARING DATE(S) : 13 August 1999 JUDGMENT DATE : 25 August 1999
PARTIES : Wayne Kirkland v Joseph Gilferd Moore and David Crowther JUDGMENT OF : Spigelman CJ at 1; Priestley JA at 2; Giles JA at 28
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : DC 3408/96 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER : Her Honour Judge Gibb
COUNSEL : Appellant - E. Petersen Respondent - Ms S. Norton SOLICITORS : Appellant - In person Respondent (1) - Brydens Law Office CATCHWORDS : Action for negligence for not taking due care with defective equipment CASES CITED: March v E & M H Stramare Pty Ltd (1991) 171 CLR 506 DECISION : Appeal upheld
THE SUPREME COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALES
COURT OF APPEAL
CA 40524/97 DC 3408/96
SPIGELMAN CJ PRIESTLEY JA GILES JA
Wednesday, 25 August 1999
KIRKLAND v MOORE & ANOR ACTION FOR NEGLIGENCE FOR NOT TAKING DUE CARE WITH DEFECTIVE EQUIPMENT - first defendant, a tradesman, experienced with angle grinders, gives angle grinder to second defendant, also a tradesman experienced with angle grinders - angle grinder has obvious defects including a missing guard - second defendant leaves angle grinder in garage of plaintiff, with whom he is staying and who is also a tradesman experienced with angle grinders - plaintiff decides to see whether motor of angle grinder is working before deciding whether to have it repaired - switches it on - is struck in eye by piece of disk from angle grinder - loses sight in that eye - brings negligence action against both defendants - trial judge holds first defendant liable, second defendant not liable and awards plaintiff $86,750 damages - first defendant appeals.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate