NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal CITATION : TYNAN v MEHARG [1999] NSWCA 157 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40119/98 HEARING DATE(S) : 15 February 1999 JUDGMENT DATE : 31 May 1999
TYNAN & ORS PARTIES : v MEHARG & ANOR JUDGMENT OF : Priestley JA at 1; Handley JA at 1; Stein JA at 1
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Land & Environment Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : LEC 40242/96 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER : Sheahan J
Claimant/Respondent (1) J Blackman/L Byrne COUNSEL : Opponent (1)/Appellant - P J McEwan SC Opponent (2)/Respondent (2) - M Baird Claimant/Respondent (1) - Cleaves Mallik Gibbs, Cessnock SOLICITORS : Opponent (1)/Appellants - Emery Partners, Newcastle West Opponent (2)/Respondent (2) - Harris Wheeler, Newcastle CATCHWORDS : CONTEMPT OF COURT - NON-COMPLIANCE WITH COURT ORDER TO DEMOLISH HOUSE - APPROPRIATE PENALTY DECISION : Guilty of contempt; Orders made
THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL 40119/98 40242/96 PRIESTLEY JA HANDLEY JA STEIN JA
Monday 31 May 1999
TYNAN & ORS v MEHARG & ANOR
CONTEMPT OF COURT - non-compliance with court order to demolish house - appropriate penalty On 24 February 1999 the first opponents had been found guilty of contempt of court for failing to comply with an order to demolish a house on or before 30 November 1998. Contempt proceedings were commenced on 3 December 1998. The order was fully complied with by 6 March. HELD: (1) Although a late start was made towards compliance with the order, reasonably expeditious steps had been taken towards compliance from mid-February. (2) It was appropriate for the Court to take into account the economic and personal losses of the contemnors caused by compliance with the order. ORDERS
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate