NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal CITATION : REGINA v James SALEAM [1999] NSWCCA 86 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60719/97 HEARING DATE(S) : 13 April 1999 JUDGMENT DATE : 27 April 1999
PARTIES : Crown (Respondent) Applicant in Person JUDGMENT OF : Spigelman CJ at 1; Studdert J at 2; Simpson J at 3
COUNSEL : Crown : W G Dawe QC (Respondent) Applicant in Person SOLICITORS : Crown : R Gray CATCHWORDS : Application for production of documents from DPP and Commissioner of Police; Legitimate forensic purpose (R v Saleam (1989) 15 NSWLR 14) applied ; Exclusion of prosecution evidence on public policy grounds (R v Ridgeway (1995) 184 CLR 19) ; "On the cards" test (Alister v R (1984) 154 CLR 404 not satisfied. ACTS CITED : Customs Act 1901 R v Gallagher (1986) 160 CLR 392 R v Mickelberg (1989) 167 CLR 259 at 301-302 CASES CITED: Alister v R (1984) 154 CLR 404 R v Saleam (1989 15 NSWLR 14 R v Ali Tastan (1994) 75 A Crim R 498 R v Ridgeway (1995) 184 CLR 19 DECISION : Applications dismissed
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 60719/97
SPIGELMAN CJ STUDDERT J SIMPSON J
Tuesday 27 April 1999
REGINA v James SALEAM Judgment
1 SPIGELMAN CJ: I agree with Simpson J. ********** IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 60719/97
SPIGELMAN CJ STUDDERT J SIMPSON J
Tuesday 27 April 1999
REGINA v James SALEAM Judgment
2 STUDDERT J: I agree with Simpson J. ********** IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
60719/97
SPIGELMAN CJ STUDDERT J SIMPSON J
Tuesday 27 April 1999
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate