NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : [1999] 17 ACLC 828
New South Wales Supreme Court CITATION : Femley Pty Limited & Ors v Salken Engineering Pty Limited [1999] NSWSC 334 CURRENT JURISDICTION : Equity FILE NUMBER(S) : 1531/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 29/3/1999 JUDGMENT DATE : 15 April 1999
In the matter of Femley Pty Limited, Taylor Lea Pty Limited & Kehoe Pty Limited and the Corporations Law PARTIES : Femley Pty Limited (ACN 083 186 743) Taylor Lea Pty Limited (ACN 083 403 776) and Kehoe Pty Limited (ACN 003 483 949) (Ps) Salken Engineering Pty Limited (ACN 002 923 873) (D) JUDGMENT OF : Santow J
COUNSEL : C R C Newlinds (P) J B Simpkins (D) SOLICITORS : Dibbs Crowther & Osborne (P) Henry Davis York (D) CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS LAW — Statutory Demand in relation to a joint debt of partnership companies (if owed) — Single composite application to set aside rather than one application by each partner company — Compliance with s459G — Defect or irregularity within s467A. Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (NSW) s23(b) Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ACTS CITED : Corporations (NSW) Act 1990 s10(1) Corporations Law s459E, s459F, s459G, s459T, s467A. Pt 5.4 Partnership Act 1892 (NSW) s9 Bank of Western Australian v The Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1994) 125 ALR 605 Bartex Fabrics Pty Ltd v Phillips Fox (1994) 12 ACLC 462 David Grant & Co Pty Limited v Westpac Banking Corporation [1995] 184 CLR 265 Dolvelle Pty Limited v Australian Macfarms Pty Limited (1998) 43 NSWLR 717 Eden Bay Pty Ltd v Bennett & Co 91997) 15 ACLC 1,634 Ex parte Blain; re Sawers (1879) 12 ChD 522 CASES CITED : Graywinter Properties Pty Ltd v Gas and Fuel Corp Super Fund (1996) 21 ACSR 581 Help Desk Institute Limited v Adams (1999) 17 ACLC 18 Marr v Australian Telecommunications Corporation (1991) 24 ALD 473 Re Meiklejohn; Ex parte Barnard [1961] QdR 70 Re Myers (1932) 5 ABC 128 Re Pepper (1969) 14 FLR 282 Upperedge v Bailey (1994) 13 ACSR 541 Z-tek Computers Pty Ltd v Aus Linx International Pty Ltd (1997) 15 ACLC 1,233 DECISION : Composite application to set aside statutory demands in relation to joint partnership debt complies with s459G
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate