NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court CITATION : Scholten v Mobilesoft Pty Ltd [1999] NSWSC 234 CURRENT JURISDICTION : Equity FILE NUMBER(S) : 1719/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 24/03/99 JUDGMENT DATE : 24 March 1999
Gregory John David Scholten (P) Mobilesoft Pty Limited (D1) Technology Ventures Pty Limited (D2) PARTIES : Icon Ventures Pty Limited (D3) Mobilesoft Consulting Pty Limited (D4) Thomas Craig Simms (D5) Brian Simms (D6) Brian Lindsay Simms (D7) JUDGMENT OF : Hamilton J
COUNSEL : Mark Ashhurst (P) Robert Reitano (D1-D7) SOLICITORS : Peter Kemp Solicitors (P) Gilbert & Tobin (D1-D7) CATCHWORDS : CORPORATIONS [98] - Management and administration - Directors and other officers - Authority and powers - Of directors individually. EQUITY [350] - Equitable remedies - Injunctions - To restrain breach of contract - Contract of type of which specific performance not granted - Impossibility of supervision by court - Contract requiring continuous supervision. Northside Developments Pty Ltd v Registrar-General (1990) 170 CLR 146 CASES CITED : Hogg v Dymock (1993) 11 ACSR 14 J C Williamson Ltd v Lukey (1931) 45 CLR 282 DECISION : Application for interlocutory injunctions in part granted and in part refused.
MJ:MC 2
~24/03/99 3 THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
HAMILTON J
WEDNESDAY, 24 MARCH 1999
1719/99 GREGORY JOHN DAVID SCHOLTEN v MOBILESOFT PTY LIMITED & ORS
JUDGMENT
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate