NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v L J Murphy [2000] NSWCCA 297 revised - 23/08/2000 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60765/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 10/08/00 JUDGMENT DATE : 23 August 2000
PARTIES : Regina Leslie Joseph Murphy JUDGMENT OF : Spigelman CJ at 1; Grove J at 2; Kirby J at 3
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 98/11/0247 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Acting Judge Downs QC OFFICER :
COUNSEL : R A Hulme (Crown) D A Wetmore (App) SOLICITORS : S E O'Connor (Crown) Mark Solomon & Assocs (App) CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Appeal against conviction and sentence - Criminal trial without jury - Need for judge to canvas evidence, arguments, giving reasons - Errors of law s17(2) and s17(3) of Criminal Procedure Act, 1986 Crimes Act, 1900 - s61D LEGISLATION CITED : Criminal Procedure Act, 1986 - S16(1); s17 Evidence Act, 1995 - s128; s132; s165 Fleming v The Queen (1998) 158 ALR 379 Carlson v The King (1947) 64 WN(NSW) 65 NSW Medical Defence Union Limited v Crawford [No 2] (NSWCA, 30 June 1994) CASES CITED: Soulemezis v Dudley (Holdings) Pty Limited (1987) NSWLR 247 R v Maxwell (CCA, unreported, 23.12.98) R v Johnston (1998) 45 NSWLR 362 R v Longman (1989) 168 CLR 79 Bromley v The Queen (1986) 161 CLR 315 DECISION : Ref para 96
IN THE COURT OF
CRIMINAL APPEAL 60765/99
SPIGELMAN CJ GROVE J KIRBY J Wednesday 23 August 2000
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate