Westpac Banking Corporation v Tanzone Pty Limited & Ors [2000] NSWCA 77

New South Wales Court of Appeal

CITATION : Westpac Banking Corporation v Tanzone Pty Limited & Ors [2000] NSWCA 77 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40453/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 28/2/00 29/2/00 (Judgment on appeal) JUDGMENT DATE : 5 April 2000

PARTIES : Westpac Banking Corporation v Tanzone Pty Limited, Perpetual Trustee Company Limited and Archie Raymond and Mary Ann Raymond JUDGMENT OF : Priestley JA at 1; Fitzgerald JA at 1; Foster AJA at 1

LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Supreme Court LOWER COURT ED 5075/98 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Windeyer J JUDICIAL OFFICER :

Appellant - R. Macfarlan QC / P. Durack COUNSEL : Respondents - T. Bathurst QC / D. Hammerschlag Cth Attorney General (Intervening) - R. Orr / M. Duncan Appellant - Allen Allen & Hemsley Respondent 1 - Freehill Hollingdale & Page SOLICITORS : Respondent 2 - Heidtman & Co Respondent 3 - Barker Gosling Intervenor - Cth Govt Solicitor CATCHWORDS : Reasons for decisions on disputed costs orders and on question whether restitution appropriate to be considered in the appeal. LEGISLATION CITED : Supreme Court Act 1970 s75A(10) Supreme Court Rules Pt 51 r 26 Permanent Trustee Australia Ltd v FAI General Insurance Co Ltd Supreme Court,(unreported, 3 June 1998 CASES CITED: Production Spray Painting and Panel Beating Pty Ltd v Newnham [No 2] (1992) 27 NSWLR 659 TCN Channel Nine v Antoniadis [No 2] [1999] NSWCA 104 DECISION : Appeal allowed. Orders as in par 16 of judgment.