NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Combined Excavations & Supplies v Bowis [2000] NSWCA 298 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40310/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 16 October 2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 30 October 2000
Combined Excavations & Supplies Pty Ltd (Appellant) PARTIES : v Paul James Bowis (Respondent) JUDGMENT OF : Spigelman CJ at 1; Heydon JA at 27; Davies AJA at 73
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT 868/99 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Delaney DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : A: Mr J Hatzistergos R: Mr D Ronzani SOLICITORS : A: Vandervords R: P D Banister CATCHWORDS : District Court - discretion to dispense with trial by jury - what factors are relevant to the exercise of the discretion - whether considerations of a universal character relevant to jury trial may be relied on - whether the factor relied on must be significant and specific - whether primary Judge erred in dispensing with jury. District Court Act 1973, ss 77-79A LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995, s 144 Supreme Court Act 1970, s 85-87, 89 Pambula District Hospital v Herriman (1988) 14 NSWLR 387 Smoje v Trend Laboratories Pty Ltd (Cole J, 27/5/88, unrep) CASES CITED: Forbes Services Memorial Club Limited v Hodge (C/A, 8/5/95, unrep) Nankervis v Ulan Coal Mines Ltd [1999] NSWSC 899 Clifton Bricks Pty Ltd v Gerlach [2000] NSWCA 90 Langford v Turnbull (Kirby P, 29/5/90, unrep) DECISION : Appeal allowed and order below set aside. See para 95.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate