Marsden v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Ltd [1999] NSWSC 122
NSW Caselaw
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
New South Wales
Supreme Court
CITATION : Marsden v Amalgamated Television Services Pty Ltd [1999] NSWSC 122
CURRENT JURISDICTION : Common Law
FILE NUMBER(S) : 20223 of 1995; 20592 of 1996
HEARING DATE(S) : 22 February 1999
JUDGMENT DATE :
22 February 1999
JOHN MARSDEN
(Plaintiff)
PARTIES : v
AMALGAMATED TELEVISION SERVICES PTY LIMITED
(Defendant)
JUDGMENT OF : Levine J
I Barker Q.C.
G O'L Reynolds S.C.
R G McHugh
(Plaintiff)
COUNSEL :
W H Nicholas Q.C.
J S Wheelhouse
R Titterton
(Defendant)
Phillips Fox
(Plaintiff)
SOLICITORS :
Mallesons Stephen Jacques
(Defendant)
CATCHWORDS : On application to reconsider matters in judgment of 18 February 1999
DECISION : See paragraph 3
- 2 -
DLJT: 13
(Ex Tempore - Revised)
THE SUPREME COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALES
COMMON LAW DIVISION
DEFAMATION LIST
No. 20223 of 1995
No. 20592 of 1996
JUSTICE DAVID LEVINE
MONDAY 22 FEBRUARY 1999
JOHN MARSDEN
(Plaintiff)
v
AMALGAMATED TELEVISION SERVICES PTY LIMITED
ACN 000 145 246
(Defendant)
JUDGMENT (On application to reconsider matters in judgment of 18 February 1999)
1 HIS HONOUR: A further application has been made on behalf of the defendant framed in terms of a request that I reconsider the matters referred to in paragraph 3(i), (ii), (iv) and (v) of the ruling I gave on 18 February 1999.
2 In support of that application Mr Nicholas rehearses in effect all that had been put to me on those issues by Mr Wheelhouse who has argued the matter on 17 February.
3 The ruling I gave on 18 February speaks for itself. I decline to give any of those matters further consideration.
Last Modified:
DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated.