NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal CITATION : KURNELL DEVELOPMENTS PTY. LIMITED & ANOR. v. ORICA AUSTRALIA PTY. LIMITED & ORS. [1999] NSWCA 163 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40826/98 HEARING DATE(S) : 22 March 1999 JUDGMENT DATE : 11 June 1999
KURNELL DEVELOPMENTS PTY. LIMITED (1 Claimant/Plaintiff) PAUL WILLIAMS (2 Claimant/Plaintiff) PARTIES : ORICA AUSTRALIA PTY. LIMITED (formerly ICI OPERATIONS PTY. LIMITED) (1 Opponent/Defendant) ORICA LIMITED (formerly ICI AUSTRALIA LIMITED) (2 Opponent/Defendant) JOHN LOSCHIAVO (3 Opponent/Defendant)
JUDGMENT OF : Powell JA at 1; Giles JA at 42
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Supreme Court - Equity Division LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : ED 2251/98 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER : Bryson J
COUNSEL : P.M. Biscoe QC and R.J. Weber (Claimants) L.G. Foster SC (Opponents) SOLICITORS : Colin Biggers & Paisley (Claimants) Mallesons Stephen Jaques (Opponents) CATCHWORDS : PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Summary dismissal - Principles applicable - When inappropriate DECISION : Leave to appeal refused; Summons dismissed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40826/98 ED 2251/98
POWELL JA GILES JA
11 June 1999
KURNELL DEVELOPMENTS PTY. LIMITED & ANOR. v. ORICA AUSTRALIA PTY. LIMITED & ORS
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate