NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court CITATION : West End Motor Group Pty Ltd v Fisher [1999] NSWSC 1071 CURRENT JURISDICTION : Equity Division FILE NUMBER(S) : 2673/97 HEARING DATE(S) : 29 March - 1 April, 6-7 April and 19 April 1999 JUDGMENT DATE : 9 November 1999
West End Motor Group Pty Ltd (formerly W A Fisher Enterprises Pty Ltd) (P & 1XD) William Austral Fisher (D1 & XC) PARTIES : W A Fisher Pty Ltd (D2) Terry J Dodd (2XD) Alan John Potter (3XD) JUDGMENT OF : Hamilton J
COUNSEL : P Hallen SC and M K Meek (P & XDs) R Dubler (1 & 2D & XC) SOLICITORS : Schrader & Associates (P & XDs) Corrs Chambers Westgarth (1 & 2D & XC) CATCHWORDS : EQUITY [76] [77] - General principles - Mistake - Equitable relief - Rectification - Generally - Pre-existing concluded oral contract or common intention sufficient - Nature of evidence required and onus of proof - Convincing proof required. Bush v National Australia Bank (1992) 35 NSWLR 390 Commissioner of Stamp Duties (NSW) v Carlenka Pty Ltd (1995) 41 NSWLR 329 CASES CITED : Lief Investments Pty Limited v Conagra International Fertiliser Company 16 July 1998, NSW CA, unreported Pukallus v Cameron (1982) 180 CLR 447 Re BT Property Trust 31 March 1998, Hamilton J, unreported, noted in (1998) 72 ALJ 933 DECISION : Plaintiff found entitled to rectification.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
HAMILTON J
TUESDAY, 9 NOVEMBER 1999
2673/97 WEST END MOTOR GROUP PTY LIMITED (formerly W A FISHER ENTERPRISES PTY LIMITED v WILLIAM AUSTRAL FISHER & ANOR
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate