NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal CITATION : REGINA v. CROWDEY [1999] NSWCCA 24 revised - 10/03/99 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60527 of 1998 HEARING DATE(S) : Friday 5 March 1999 JUDGMENT DATE : 5 March 1999
PARTIES : REGINA v. CROWDEY, Terrence John JUDGMENT OF : Greg James J at 1; Grove J at 26; Dunford J at 27
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 98/11/0089 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER : Solomon, DCJ.
COUNSEL : Crown: P. Hastings, QC./G. Tabuteau Respondent: P. Byrne, SC. SOLICITORS : Crown: Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions Respondent: Murphy's Lawyers CATCHWORDS : Sentence - Crown appeal - findings of trial judge - "tariff" - small sample of other cases - manifest inadequacy - mental condition - discretions in Crown appeals - constraints on substituted sentence. ACTS CITED : Criminal Appeal Act - s.5D Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) - s.16A(2) The Queen v. Forrester (CCA unreported 16 October 1998) Regina v. Soonius (CCA unreported 29 March 1998) The Queen v. L. (CCA unreported 17 June 1996) Regina v. King [1999] NSWCCA 16 CASES CITED: Regina v. Hallocoglu (1992) 29 NSWLR 67 Regina v. Kelly (1993) 30 NSWLR 64 Cranssen v. The Queen (1936) 55 CLR 509 The Queen v. WHS (CCA unreported 27 March 1995) The Queen v. Gallagher (1991) 23 NSWLR 220 The Queen v. Jurisic (CCA unreported 12 August 1998) The Queen v. Hayes (1987) 29 A. Crim. R. 452 DECISION : Appeal allowed
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate