NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal CITATION : NOBREGA v. TRUSTEES OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH FOR THE ARCHDIOCESE OF SYDNEY (NO. 2) [1999] NSWCA 133 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40531/97 HEARING DATE(S) : 23 March 1999 and Written Submissions JUDGMENT DATE : 21 May 1999
PARTIES : TONY NOBREGA by his next friend LUDOVINA NOBREGA (Appellant) THE TRUSTEES OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH FOR THE ARCHDIOCESE OF SYDNEY (Respondent) JUDGMENT OF : Priestley JA at 1; Powell JA at 2; Sheppard AJA at 24
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : DC7250/95 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER : Patten DCJ
COUNSEL : M.J. Joseph SC/I. Asuzi (Appellant) S.A. Woods (Respondent) SOLICITORS : White Barnes (Appellant) Shaw McDonald (Responent) CATCHWORDS : COSTS - Of appeal - Departing from general rule - Offers of compromise - Made otherwise than in accordance with Supreme Court Rules Evidence Act 1995 s.131(1) ACTS CITED : (2)(h): SCR Pt 52A r.22 Calderbank v. Calderbank [1976] Fam 93 Messiter v. Hutchinson (1987) 10 NSWLR 525 CASES CITED: Amev Finance Limited v. Artes Studios Thoroughbreds Pty. Limited (1988) 13 NSWLR 486 Bruinsma v. Menczer (1995) 40 NSWLR 716 Sanko Steamship Co. Limited v. Sumitomo Australia Limited FED No. 22/96 Fotheringham v. Fotheringham (No. 2) [1999] NSWCA 21 DECISION : Order made
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40531/97 DC 7250/95
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate