NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : [2000] 158 FLR 359 [2000] 36 ACSR 72
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : REGINA v HANNES [2000] NSWCCA 503 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60600/99; 60508/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 30 October 2000 31 October 2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 1 December 2000
PARTIES : Regina Simon Gautier Hannes JUDGMENT OF : Spigelman CJ at 1; Studdert J at 397; Dowd J at 485
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 97/11/0562 97/11/0502 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Backhouse DCJ OFFICER :
COUNSEL : D F Jackson QC/M Wigney (Appellant) T Game SC/ D Hammerschlag (Crown) SOLICITORS : Phillips Fox (Appellant) Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - summing up - adequacy and fairness - CRIMINAL LAW - non-consensual verdict - EVIDENCE - handwriting opinion evidence - Evidence Act 1995, ss55 and 56 - EVIDENCE - hearsay - "intended" representation, Evidence Act 1995, s59 - CRIMINAL LAW - direction given when accused does not give evidence - "Weissensteiner direction" - Evidence Act 1995, s20 Corporations Law Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) LEGISLATION CITED : Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW) Evidence Act 1898 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 Financial Transaction Reports Act 1988 (Cth) Jury Act 1977 (NSW) Adami v The Queen (1959) 108 CLR 605 Butera v Director of Public Prosecutions for the State of Victoria (1987) 164 CLR 180 Cleland v The Queen (1982) 151 CLR 1 Connell v The Queen (No 6) (1992) 12 WAR 133 Domican v The Queen (1991-1992) 173 CLR 555 Jones v Dunkel (1958-1959) 101 CLR 298 KBT v The Queen (1996-1997) 191 CLR 417 Lee v The Queen (1998) 195 CLR 594 M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487 Papakosmas v The Queen (1999) 196 CLR 297 Pollitt v The Queen (1991-1992) 174 CLR 558 R v Black (1993) 179 CLR 44 R v Browne-Kerr [1990] VR 78 R v Casey (1926) 26 SR (NSW) 189 CASES CITED: R v Fowler [2000] NSWCCA 142 R v Guerin [1967] 1 NSWR 255 R v Holden [1974] 2 NSWLR 548 R v Hong Jus Ten and Eng Chin Ei (Western Australian Court of Criminal Appeal, 6 November 1972, unreported) R v Ives [1973] QdR 128 R v OGD (1997) 45 NSWLR 744 R v Piazza (1997) 94 ACrimR 459 R v Sorlie (1925) 25 SR (NSW) 532 R v Zorad (1990) 19 NSWLR 91 RPS v The Queen (2000) 74 ALJR 449 Shepherd v The Queen (1990) 170 CLR 573 Spies v The Queen (2000) 74 ALJR 1263 Stoddart's case (1909) 2 CrAppR 217 Walton v The Queen (1988-1989) 166 CLR 283 Weissensteiner v The Queen (1993) 178 CLR 217 DECISION : 1 Appeal allowed; 2 Convictions quashed; 3 There be a new trial on all counts; 4 Crown appeal dismissed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate