NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court CITATION : NOBBS v HACKETT & ORS [1999] NSWSC 379 CURRENT JURISDICTION : Common Law Division FILE NUMBER(S) : 12373/98 HEARING DATE(S) : 29/03/99, 31/03/99, 15/04/99, 16/04/99 JUDGMENT DATE : 16 April 1999
Kaylene Lesley Nobbs (Plaintiff) Leanne Hackett (First Defendant) PARTIES : Brett Anthony Bell (Second Defendant) Royal Society foer the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (Third Defendant) Peter Smith (Fourth Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Adams J at 1
COUNSEL : Mr C Papayanni (Plaintiff) Mr R Lancaster (First Defendant and Third Defendants) Ramrakha Jenkins (Plaintiff) SOLICITORS : Smythe & Mallam (First and Third Defendants)
CATCHWORDS : Search warrant; Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1989; effect of invalidity; other powers of entry; search and removal of animals; whether entry lawful despite invalidity of warrant; prerequisites for exercise of statutory powers Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1979 Search Warrants Act 1985 ACTS CITED : Marketing of Primary Products Act 1927 Police Offences Act 1901 Justices Act 1902 Egg Marketing Board v Cassar [1978] 1 NSWLR 90 Grove v Eastern Gas Board [1952] 1 KB 77 CASES CITED : Fowler v Taylor [1957] VR 593 Christie v Leachinsky (1947) AC 573 Johnson v Miller (1958) 59 CLR 467 Puglisi & Anor v Australian Fisheries Management Authority & Ors 148 ALR 393 AT 405 DECISION : Principal relief sought by plaintiff is refused, subject to orders.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate