NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court CITATION : HARTIGAN v INTERNATIONAL KRISHNA CONSCIOUSNESS [1999] NSWSC 57 CURRENT JURISDICTION : EQUITY FILE NUMBER(S) : 3328/94 HEARING DATE(S) : 04/12/98 JUDGMENT DATE : 15 February 1999
JANET HARTIGAN PARTIES : v INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR KRISHNA CONSCIOUSNESS INCORPORATED JUDGMENT OF : Bryson J at 1
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Supreme Court (Master) LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 3328/94 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER : Master Macready
COUNSEL : PLAINTIFF: MR N PERRAM DEFENDANT: MR D A SMALLBONE SOLICITORS : PLAINTIFF: MALLESONS STEPHEN JAQUES DEFENDANT: JAMES CATCHWORDS : PRACTICE and PROCEDURE; summary stay or dismissal; want of prosecution; reversing Master, summary dismissal was refused on discretionary grounds.; delays were not inexecusable and were not attributable to abandonment of the claim SCA s 75A (7). SCR Pt.33 r.6 (1) (2) 3 4. SCR Pt.5 r.12. ACTS CITED : SCR Pt. 40 r.8(1). SCR Pt.1B r.9. Stollznow v Calvert [1980] 2 NSWLR 749. Witten v Lombard Australia Limited(1968) 88 WN (Pt.1) (NSW) 405. Southern Cross Exploration NL and Others v Fire & All Risks Insurance Co Ltd and Others (1986) 4 NSWLR 491. Birkett v James [1978] AC 297. Cohen v McWilliam and Another (1995) 38 NSWLR 476. DECISION : SEE PARAGRAPH 31
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
BRYSON J
Monday 15 February 1999
3328/1994 JANET HARTIGAN v INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR KRISHNA CONSCIOUSNESS INCORPORATED
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate