NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v D B K Ridgeway [2000] NSWCCA 286 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60203/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 04/08/00 JUDGMENT DATE : 24 August 2000
PARTIES : Regina Daniel Brent Kenneth Ridgeway JUDGMENT OF : Beazley JA at 1; Grove J at 2; Kirby J at 6
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 99/21/1215 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Backhouse DCJ OFFICER :
COUNSEL : L M B Lamprati/S Piedade (Crown/App) R Burgess (Resp) SOLICITORS : S E O'Connor (Crown/App) D J Humphreys - LAC (Resp) CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL PRACTICE & PROCEDURE - Crown appeal against inadequacy of sentence - Sentencing guidelines - armed robbery - If departure from guidelines, reasons should be given - Whether double jeopardy justifies not altering non-parole period Criminal Appeal Act, 1912 - s5D LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes Act, 1900 - s97(1): s114: s188: s195 Drug Misuse & Trafficking Act, 1985 - s25 R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346 R v Micallef (CCA, unreported, 3 November 1997) R v Rushby (1977) 1 NSWLR 594 The Queen v Yenice (1994) 72 A Crim R 234 CASES CITED: R v Lattouf (CCA, unreported, 12 December 1996) R v Govinden [1999] NSWCCA 118 R v Baker [2000] NSWCCA 85 Griffiths v The Queen (1977) 137 CLR 293 Everett v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 295 DECISION : Ref para 52
IN THE COURT OF
CRIMINAL APPEAL 60203/00
BEAZLEY JA GROVE J KIRBY J Thursday 24 August 2000
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate