NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : REGINA v. SMITH [2000] NSWCCA 343 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA No. 60314 of 2000 HEARING DATE(S) : Tuesday 29 August 2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 29 August 2000
PARTIES : REGINA v. SMITH, Kenneth Alfred JUDGMENT OF : Mason P at 1/27; Levine J at 28; Greg James J at 2
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 99/61/0127 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Bellear, DCJ. OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Crown: L.M.B. Lamprati Resp: T.A. Game, SC. SOLICITORS : Crown: S.E. O'Connor Resp: D.J. Humphreys CATCHWORDS : Criminal law - Crown appeal against asserted inadequacy of sentence - sentence inadequate - on re-sentencing, Regina v. Thomson & Houlton applied. Crimes Act 1900 LEGISLATION CITED : Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Sentencing Act 1989 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Everett (1994) 181 CLR 295 Allpass (1994) 72 A. Crim. 561 Hayes (1987) 29 A. Crim. R. 452 Warfield (1994) 34 NSWLR 200 Kalache [2000] NSWCCA 2 Fleming (1998) 158 ALR 379 CASES CITED: Hartikainen (CCA, unreported 8 June 1993) Letteri (CCA, unreported 18 March 1992) PVH (CCA, unreported 2 May 1996 Morrow [1999] NSWCCA 64 May [1999] NSWCCA 40 Griffiths (1997) 137 CLR 293 Thomson & Houlton [2000] NSWCCA 309 DECISION : Appeal allowed
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate