NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court CITATION : Regina v Patsalis & Spathis [No 4] [1999] NSWSC 715 revised - 27/09/99 CURRENT JURISDICTION : Criminal Division FILE NUMBER(S) : 70002/97; 70200/97 28 June 1999 - 30 June 1999 2 July 1999 HEARING DATE(S) : 5 July 1999 - 7 July 1999 12 July 1999 - 14 July 1999 19 July 1999 JUDGMENT DATE : 20 July 1999
Regina PARTIES : v Michael Patsalis Alexios Spathis JUDGMENT OF : Kirby J
P Power (Crown) COUNSEL : M Macgregor QC (Patsalis) D Campbell (Spathis) K Roots (Crown) SOLICITORS : Coustas & Co (Patsalis) Hancock Alldis (Spathis) CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL PRACTICE & PROCEDURE; Propensity evidence; Admissibility of ERISP tapes ACTS CITED : Evidence Act, 1995 (s95, s97, s135, s136, s137) Crimes Act, 1900 R v AH (1997) 42 NSWLR 702 R v Fordham (1997) 98 A Crim R 359 R v Wilson (1970-71) 123 CLR 334 R v Bond (1906) 2 KB 389 Harriman v The Queen (1989) 167 CLR 590 CASES CITED : R v Beserick (1993) 30 NSWLR 510 R v Makin (1893) 14 NSWLR 1 Tangye v The Queen (1997) 92 A Crim R 545 Pfennig v The Queen (1994-95) 182 CLR 461 R v Ritter (unreported, CCA, 31/08/95) R v Lockyer, Hunt CJ @ CL, 11/10/96 DECISION : Ref para 45
THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
KIRBY J
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate