NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal CITATION : Weideck v Williams [1999] NSWCA 346 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40026/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 31 August 1999 JUDGMENT DATE : 23 September 1999
Herbert Weideck (Appellant) PARTIES : v Stephen Williams (Respondent) JUDGMENT OF : Stein JA at 1; Davies AJA at 2; Wood CJatCL at 20
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Supreme Court - Common Law Division LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 10794/93 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER : Adams J
COUNSEL : A: Mr R Bartlett SC, Mr R Weinstein R: Mr P Neil SC, Mr D Hooke SOLICITORS : A: Thomas Laycock R: Stacks - The Law Firm CATCHWORDS : Damages; severely injured plaintiff; necessary that land and home be acquired for plaintiff's accommodation; what allowance should be made for the capital value of the assets; what allowance should be made for the capital value of extras such as swimming pool; whether allowance should be made for the diversion of funds from income earning purposes; whether necessary to look at the facts of the particular case. George v Pinnock [1973] 1 WLR 118 Moriarty v McCarthy [1978] 2 All ER 213 Marsland v Andjelic (1993) 31 NSWLR 162 CASES CITED: Nicholson v Nicholson (1994) 35 NSWLR 308 Burford v Allan (1993) 17 MVR 119 Todorovic v Waller (1981) 150 CLR 402 Roberts v Johnstone [1988] 3 WLR 1247 Rosecrance v Rosecrance (1995) 129 FLR 310 DECISION : Allowed; See para 19
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
CA 40026/99 CD 10794/93 STEIN JA DAVIES AJA WOOD CJ at CL
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate