NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court CITATION : Wentworth v Wentworth [1999] NSWSC 638 revised - 30/08/99 CURRENT JURISDICTION : Equity FILE NUMBER(S) : 3748/89 HEARING DATE(S) : 06/05/99, 18/05/99 JUDGMENT DATE : 29 June 1999
PARTIES : Katherine Wentworth (P) Peter Fitzwilliam Neville Wentworth (Estate of George Neville Wentworth) (D) JUDGMENT OF : Santow J
COUNSEL : K Wentworth (in person) (P) C J Birch (for Attorney-General as amicus curiae) SOLICITORS : Russo & Partners (P) State Crown Solicitor (for Attorney-General as amicus curiae) CATCHWORDS : PROCEDURE — Application to re-open before judgment "entered" — Meaning of "entering" judgment — Guiding principles applicable to re-opening and illustrations — The jurisdiction to re-open is exceptional — Effect of setting aside a determination by Taxing Officer upon Court of Appeal's orders and reasoning prior to that time — Status of such determination after set aside — Voidable but avoided ab initio — Existence pending avoidance — Binding effect of Court of Appeal decision on single judge — Meaning of no order as to costs. ACTS CITED : Supreme Court Rules; Pt 20 r10, Pt 40 rr9 and 10, Pt 42 r11(1), Pt 42 r13 AB v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1998) 157 ALR 510 Antoniadis v Ramsay Surgical Ltd [1972] VR 323 Attorney-General v Kennedy Miller [1999] NSWCA 158 Autodesk Inc v Dyason (No 2) (1993) 176 CLR 300 Bailey v Marinoff (1971) 125 CLR 529 Calvin v Carr [1979] 1 NSWLR 1 Cheeseman v Bowaters United Kingdom Paper Mills [1971] 1 WLR 1773; [1971] 3 All ER 513 Commonwealth of Australia v Precision Pools Pty Ltd (1994) 53 FCR 183 Driver v Driver [1950] SASR 8 Farrow Finance Company Ltd (in liquidation) v Farrow Properties Pty Ltd (in liquidation) and Ors (SC(Vic), Hansen J, 16 April 1998, unreported) Fexuto Pty Ltd v Bosnjak Holdings Pty Ltd (No 2) (1998) 29 ACSR 290 Forbes v Trotting Club (NSW) (1979) 143 CLR 242 Glennan v Commissioner of Taxation [1999] FCA 297 Hoad v Nationwide News (1996-1997) 37 IPR 407 Re Hodgkinson [1895] 2 Ch 190 Holtby v Hodgson (1889) 24 QBD 103 King v Birch (1842) 3 QB 425; 114 ER 569 CASES CITED : MacFoy v United Africa Co Ltd [1962] AC 152 In Marriage of Moore (1996) 125 FLR 420 Oshlack v Richmond River Council [1998] 193 CLR 72 Phillips v Birch (1842) 4 Man & G 403; 134 ER 165 Pittalis v Sherefettin [1986] 1 QB 868 R v Bellington [1980] VR 625 Smith v NSW Bar Association (No 2) (1992) 176 CLR 256 Smits v Buckworth (No 2) (NSWSC, Young J, 14 November 1997, unreported) State Rail Authority of NSW v Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd (1982) 150 CLR 29 Texas Company (Australasia) Ltd v FCT (1940) 63 CLR 382 Trikas v Rheem (Australia) Pty Limited [1964] 81 WN 504 Trippe Ltd v Henderson Investments Pty Ltd (1990) 101 FLR 261 Twenty-First Australia Inc v Shade (NSWSC, Young J, 31 July 1998, unreported) Wentworth v Rogers (No 9) (1987) 8 NSWLR 388 Wentworth v Wentworth (NSWCA, 30 November 1998, unreported) Wentworth v Woollahra Municipal Council (1982) 149 CLR 672 Wilde v Australian Trade Equipment Co Pty Ltd (1981) 145 CLR 590 Yenald Nominees Pty Ltd v Como Investments Pty Ltd & Ors (1996) ATPR 41-508 DECISION : Earlier judgment not to be re-opened
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate