NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court CITATION : Allstate Explorations NL & 2 Ors v Beaconsfield Gold NL & 2 Ors [1999] NSWSC 832 CURRENT JURISDICTION : Equity FILE NUMBER(S) : 3089/98 HEARING DATE(S) : 17/06/99, 22/06/99 JUDGMENT DATE : 25 August 1999
Allstate Explorations NL ACN 000 679 023 (First Plaintiff/First Appellant/First Cross-Defendant) Allstate Prospecting Pty Limited ACN 000 809 754 (Second Plaintiff/Second Appellant/Second Cross-Defendant) PARTIES : ACN 070 164 653 Pty Limited (Third Plaintiff/Third Appellant/Third Cross-Defendant) Beaconsfield Gold NL ACN 057 793 834 (First Defendant/First Respondent/First Cross-Claimant) Beaconsfield Operations Pty Ltd ACN 009 493 583 (Second Defendant/Second Respondent/Second Cross-Claimant) Beaconsfield Tasmania Pty Ltd ACN 004 578 750 (Third Defendant/Third Respondent/Third Cross-Claimant) JUDGMENT OF : Santow J
COUNSEL : A W Street, SC/R Pepper (Plaintiffs) J Styring (Defendants) SOLICITORS : Blake Dawson Waldron (Plaintiffs) Phillips Fox (Defendants CATCHWORDS : PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE — Appeal from Master declining to order separate questions to be tried — Principles to be applied in such appeals and in ordering separate questions under Pt 31 r2 Supreme Court Rules — Particular application of those principles to the construction of contracts.; CONTRACTS — Principles of construction — Scope of resort to extrinsic evidence by way of factual matrix — "Ambiguity" an ambiguous term.; EQUITY — Fiduciary obligation of joint venture operator derived from being a fiduciary agent — Relevance of contract when not the fundamental source of the fiduciary obligation. Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) s190(3) ACTS CITED : Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) s82; s118(3) Supreme Court Rules Pt 6 r10; Pt 31 r2 American Home Assurance Co v Ampol Refineries Ltd (1987) 10 NSWLR 13 Bass and Another v Permanent Trustee Co Ltd & Ors (1999) 161 ALR 399 Do Carmo v Ford Excavations Pty Ltd (1981) 1 NSWLR 409 Golosky v Golosky (NSWCA, 5 October 1993, unreported) Hospital Products Limited v United States Surgical Corporation & Others (1984) 156 CLR 41 Jacobson v Ross [1995] 1 VR 337 Mannai Investment Co Ltd v Eagle Star Life Assurance Co Ltd [1997] 2 WLR 945 CASES CITED : Maunsell v Olins [1975] AC 373 Morrison v Judd (NSWCA, 10 October 1995, unreported) Printing & Kindred Industries Union of Australia v Clarke (Needham J, SCNSW, 17 September 1976, unreported) Rogers v Bailieu Bullock Wilkinson Pty Ltd (1981) 28 SASR 594 Scottish Power plc v Britoil (Exploration) Ltd & others (CA (Staughton,Ottom and Robert Walker LJJ), 18 November 1997, unreported) Singer v Berghouse (1994) 181 CLR 201 Carl Zeiss Stiftung v Herbert Smith & Co [1968] CA 93 Tallglen Pty Ltd v Pay TV Holdings Pty Ltd (1996) 22 ACSR 130 DECISION : Master's decision affirmed that no separate questions to be tried.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate