NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court CITATION : Regina v Patsalis & Spathis [No 10] [1999] NSWSC 990 revised - 01/10/99 CURRENT JURISDICTION : Criminal Division FILE NUMBER(S) : 70002/97; 70200/97 28 June 1999 - 30 June 1999 2 July 1999 5 July 1999 - 7 July 1999 12 July 1999 - 14 July 1999 HEARING DATE(S) : 19 July 1999 - 21 July 1999 22 July 1999 - 23 July 1999 27 July 1999 2 August 1999 - 6 August 1999 9 August 1999 JUDGMENT DATE : 10 August 1999
Regina PARTIES : v Michael Patsalis Alexios Spathis JUDGMENT OF : Kirby J
P Power (Crown) COUNSEL : J Amor-Smith (Patsalis) D Campbell (Spathis) K Roots (Crown) SOLICITORS : Coustas & Co (Patsalis) Hancock Alldis (Spathis) CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL PRACTICE & PROCEDURE; Application under s38 Evidence Act 1996; Leave sought to cross examine Crown witness; Unfavourable witness ACTS CITED : Evidence Act 1995 - s38, s135, s137, s192(2)(b)&(c) R v Lozano (CCA, unreported, 10 June 1997) CASES CITED : R v GAC (CCA, unreported, 19 December 1996) R v Richard Adam (Wood CJ at CL, unreported, 3.12.98) DECISION : Refer para 33
THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES CRIMINAL DIVISION
KIRBY J
Tuesday 10 August 1999
70002/97 - REGINA v MICHAEL PATSALIS 70200/97 - REGINA v ALEXIOS SPATHIS
JUDGMENT (Re Second Application under s38 Evidence Act 1995) [No. 10]
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate