NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : [2000] 181 ALR 694 [2000] 158 FLR 81
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : JOHN FAIRFAX PUBLICATIONS PTY LIMITED v THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW SOUTH WALES [2000] NSWCA 198 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40875/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 13 December 1999 JUDGMENT DATE : 2 August 2000
(Claimant) John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd PARTIES : (Opponent) The Attorney General for the State of New South Wales JUDGMENT OF : Spigelman CJ at 1; Priestley JA at 135; Meagher JA at 163
COUNSEL : (Claimant) S Rares SC, M A Wigney (Opponent) M G Sexton SC SOLICITORS : (Claimant) Freehill Hollingdale & Page (Opponent) I V Knight CATCHWORDS : CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - incompatibility with Chapter III of Commonwealth Constitution - manner of performance of function not incompatible - in camera proceedings, Supreme Court Act 1970 s101A - CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - freedom of communication on matters of government and politics - in camera proceedings, Supreme Court Act 1970 s101A Courts Legislation Amendment Act 1996 LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes (Amendment) Act 1951 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Supreme Court Act 1970 Attorney-General (NSW) v John Fairfax & Sons Ltd and Bacon (1985) 6 NSWLR 695 Attorney General (NSW) v John Fairfax Publications Pty Limited [1999] NSWSC 318 Attorney General (NSW) v Time Magazine (NSW Court of Appeal, 15 September 1994, unreported) Attorney General's Reference (No 1 of 1974) [1974] 1 QB 744 Attorney General's Reference (No 1 of 1983) [1983] 2 VR 410 Broken Hill Proprietary Company Ltd v Dagi [1996] 2 VR 117 Bruce v Cole (1998) 45 NSWLR 163 Chu Kheng Lim v Minister for Immigration (1992) 176 CLR 1 Civil Aviation Authority v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1995) 39 NSWLR 540 Commodity Futures Trading Commission v Scher (1986) 478 US 833 Coulter v The Queen (1987-1988) 164 CLR 350 Daubney v Cooper (1829) 109 ER 438 Davis v The Commonwealth (1988) 166 CLR 79 Dickason v Dickason (1913) 17 CLR 50 Director of Public Prosecutions Reference No 2 of 1996 [1998] 3 VR 241 Esso Australia Resources v Dawson (1999) 87 FCR 588 Ex parte Bread Manufacturers Ltd; Re Truth and Sportsman Ltd (1937) 37 SR (NSW) 242 Felman v Law Institute of Victoria [1998] 4 VR 324 Grollo v Palmer (1995) 184 CLR 348 H A Bachrach Pty Limited v Queensland (1998) 195 CLR 547 Hamersley Iron Pty Ltd v Lovell (1998) 19 WAR 316 Harris v Caladine (1990-1991) 172 CLR 84 Hilton v Wells (1985) 157 CLR 57 Hinch v Attorney-General for the State of Victoria (1987) 184 CLR 15 James v Cowan (1929-1930) 43 CLR 386 John Fairfax v Doe (1995) 37 NSWLR John Pfeiffer Pty Ltd v Rogerson [2000] HCA 36 Kable v The Director of Public Prosecutions for the State of New South Wales (1996) 189 CLR 501 Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1997) 189 CLR 520 CASES CITED: Levy v Victoria (1996-1997) 189 CLR 579 Lloyd v Snooks [1999] TASSC 1117 McPherson v McPherson [1936] AC 177 Mann v O'Neill (1996-1997) 191 CLR 204 Mellifont v Attornney General (Qld) (1991) 173 CLR 289 Mistretta v United States (1989) 488 US 361 Nationwide News v Wills (1991-1992) 177 CLR 1 Nicholas v The Queen (1998) 193 CLR 173 Ogden Industries v Lucas [1970] AC 113 Polyukhovick v The Commonwealth (1991) 172 CLR 501 R v Cheng [1999] NSWCCA 373 R v Moffatt [1998] 2 VR 229 R v Nicholls (1911) 12 CLR 280 R v Snow (1915) 20 CLR 315 R v Tait (1979) 46 FLR 386 R v Wynbyne (1997) 99 A Crim R 1 Re Colina; Ex parte Torney (1999) 73 ALJR 1576 Re Nolan; Ex parte Young (1991) 172 CLR 460 Registrar of the Court of Appeal v Willesee (1985) 3 NSWLR 650 Richmond Newspapers Inc v Virginia (1980) 448 US 555 Rohde v Director of Public Prosecutions (1986) 161 CLR 119 Russell v Russell (1976) 134 CLR 495 Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417 Stephens v West Australian Newspapers Ltd (1993-1994) 182 CLR 211 The Queen v Humby; Ex Parte Rooney (1973) 129 CLR 231 Theophanous v Herald and Weekly Times Ltd (1993-1994) 182 CLR 104 Thompson v Mastertouch TV Service Pty Ltd (No 3) (1978) 38 FLR 397 Victoria v Australian Building Construction Employees' and Builders Labourers' Federation (1982) 152 CLR 25 Wilson v Minister for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Affairs (1996) 189 CLR 1 Witham v Holloway (1995) 183 CLR 525 DECISION : Declare that each of subs (7) and (8)(a) of s101A of the Supreme Court Act 1970 is invalid; Declare that subs (9) of s101A of the Supreme Court Act 1970 is invalid insofar as it applies to a publication in contravention of subs (8)(a); Order the Opponent to pay the Claimant's costs
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate