NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : CLARKE v HEALTH CARE COMPLAINTS COMMISSION [2000] NSWCA 124 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40215/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 5 May 2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 5 May 2000
PARTIES : Attlee Louis Clarke - Appellant Health Care Complaints Commission - Respondent JUDGMENT OF : Priestley JA at 20; Handley JA at 21; Sheller JA at 1
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Medical Tribunal LOWER COURT 40029/98 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Karpin DCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : M Bozic - Appellant H Kiel - Respondent SOLICITORS : Tress Cocks & Maddox - Appellant Health Care Complaints Commission - Respondent CATCHWORDS : MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS - Complaints of professional misconduct - Criminal proceedings against practitioner set to begin after the complaints proceedings - Application for adjournment of complaints proceedings refused by Medical Tribunal - Appeal pursuant to Medical Practice Act 1992, s89 - No error of law - ND LEGISLATION CITED : Medical Practice Act 1992 CASES CITED: Edelsten v Richmond (1987) 11 NSWLR 51 Ibrahim v Walton (unreported) 23 April 1991 DECISION : Appeal dismissed with costs.
THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL CA 40215/00 MT 40029/98 PRIESTLEY JA HANDLEY JA SHELLER JA
Friday, 5 May 2000
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate