NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court CITATION : Foyster v ANZ Banking Group [1999] NSWSC 300 CURRENT JURISDICTION : Common Law Division FILE NUMBER(S) : 21004 of 1995 HEARING DATE(S) : 04/05/98 JUDGMENT DATE : 10 May 1999
PARTIES : Lloyd Foyster (plaintiff) Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Limited (defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Hidden J at 1
COUNSEL : R. Sofroniou (plaintiff) J.S. Wheelhouse (defendant) SOLICITORS : G.H. Healey & Co (plaintiff) Blake Dawson Waldron (defendant) CATCHWORDS : Statement of Claim - motions by defendant to dismiss, by plaintiff to amend - plaintiff entered into deed of assignment under Pt X of Bankrupty Act - whether causes of action re-vest in plaintiff upon issue of certificate under s232 of the Act Bankruptcy Act 1966 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) ACTS CITED : Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) Limitation Act 1969 Supreme Court Rules 1970 District Court Rules Pegler v Dale (1975) 1 NSWLR 265 Maple v David Syme & Co (1974) 1 NSWLR 290 Re Kwok; Ex parte Rummel (1981) 61 FLR 336 CASES CITED : Daemar v Industrial Commission of NSW[No2] (1990) 22 NSWLR 178 Official Receiver v Todd (1986) 14 FCR 177 McGee v Yeomans [1977] 1 NSWLR 273 Wardley Aust Ltd v Western Australia (1992) 175 CLR 514 DECISION : Both motions granted in part.
THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COMMON LAW DIVISION
HIDDEN J 10 May 1999 21004 of 1995 LLOYD FOYSTER v AUSTRALIA & NEW ZEALAND BANKING GROUP LIMITED Reasons for judgment
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate