NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal CITATION : REGINA v THOMAS [1999] NSWCCA 168 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60846/98 HEARING DATE(S) : 23/06/99 JUDGMENT DATE : 7 July 1999
PARTIES : Director of Public Prosecutions Christopher Raymond Thomas JUDGMENT OF : Spigelman CJ at 1; Studdert J at 2; Adams J at 3
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER : Horler ADCJ
COUNSEL : P G Berman (Crown) P R Zahra (Appellant) SOLICITORS : C K Smith (Crown) T A Murphy (Appellant) CATCHWORDS : Multiple sexual offences; Crown appeal against sentence; conviction when serving sentences for other offences; principle of totality; need to identify circumstances of each offence Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (s 5D) ACTS CITED : Crimes Act 1910 (s 79) Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (s 21) CASES CITED: Pearce v R (1988) 156 ALR 684 DECISION : Appeal allowed
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
60846/98
SPIGELMAN CJ STUDDERT J ADAMS J
Wednesday 7 July 1999
REGINA v Christopher Raymond THOMAS
JUDGMENT
1 SPIGELMAN CJ: I agree with the judgment of Adams J.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
60846/98
SPIGELMAN CJ STUDDERT J ADAMS J
Wednesday 7 July 1999
REGINA v Christopher Raymond THOMAS
JUDGMENT
2 STUDDERT J: I agree with Adams J.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL 60846/98 SPIGELMAN CJ STUDDERT J ADAMS J Wednesday 7 July 1999
REGINA v Christopher Raymond THOMAS
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate