NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : [2000] 32 MVR 442
New South Wales Court of Appeal
CITATION : Nominal Defendant v Bogic [2000] NSWCA 164 revised - 02/05/2007 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40736/98 HEARING DATE(S) : 03/05/00 JUDGMENT DATE : 10 July 2000
PARTIES : The Nominal Defendant (Appellant) Kathy Bogic (Respondent) JUDGMENT OF : Priestley JA at 1; Stein JA at 2; Fitzgerald JA at 3
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT DC6152/97; DC6151/97 FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT Seery ADCJ JUDICIAL OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Mr R Bartlett SC (Appellant) Mr J Agius SC / Mr D Elliott (Respondent) SOLICITORS : Hunt & Hunt (Appellant) Harpers Solicitors (Respondent) CATCHWORDS : Negligence - Motor Vehicle Accident - Liability of driver of vehicle that caused accident - whether contributory negligence - whether damages awarded were excessive - ND LEGISLATION CITED : Compensation to Relatives Act 1987 Motor Accidents Act 1988 CASES CITED: Halvorsen Boats Pty Ltd v Robinson (1993) 31 NSWLR 1 Dominish v Astill (1979) 2 NSWLR 368 DECISION : Respondent's damages for nervous shock reduced from $233,999 to $191,905. Judgment under the Compensation to Relatives Act varied to give effect to the following apportionment, namely 41.8857% to the respondent, with the balance divided between the children in the proportions 82/314 to the eldest child, 97/314 to the second child and 135/314 to the youngest child. Appeal otherwise dismissed, with costs. The parties to bring in short minutes of the orders to be made pursuant to these reasons within 7 days.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate