NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal CITATION : Kessey v Golledge [1999] NSWCA 424 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40261/98 HEARING DATE(S) : 02/11/99 JUDGMENT DATE : 26 November 1999
PARTIES : Robin Joseph Kessey - Appellant Kathryn Joy Golledge - Respondent JUDGMENT OF : Sheller JA at 1; Beazley JA at 2; Rolfe J at 3
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 5406/97; 13693/96 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER : Sinclair DCJ, Dowd J, Master Greenwood
COUNSEL : Mr J. Poulos QC/Mr D.L. Ronzani - Appellant Mr B.F. Murray QC/Mr J.P. Sewell - Respondent SOLICITORS : Dunhill Madden Butler - Appellant Owen Hodge & Son - Respondent CATCHWORDS : Appeal from Interlocutory Orders; Appeals against Master's decision extending time to bring proceedings under Motor Accidents Act 1988 and against single Judge's decision dismissing that appeal dismissed.; Appeal From Trial Judge's Assessment of Damages; (a) Consideration of novus actus interveniens; (b) Amount to be deducted conformably with principle in Kempsey District Hospital v Thackham; (c) Generally parties should be held on appeal to the way in which the case was conducted at first instance. Motor Accidents Act 1988 ACTS CITED : Supreme Court Act 1970 Workers Compensation Act 1987 Ramton v Cassin (1995) 38 NSWLR 88; (1996) 70 ALJR 558 Salido v The Nominal Defendant (1993) 32 NSWLR 524 Brisbane South Regional Health Authority v Taylor (1996) 186 CLR 541 Oldfields Pty Limited v Alfar (1996) 70 ALJR 560 McKew v Holland & Hannon & Cubitts (Scotland) Limited [1969] 3 All ER 1621 Kempsey District Hospital v Thackham (1995) 36 NSWLR 492 CASES CITED: Multicon Engineering Pty Limited v Federal Airports Corporation (Court of Appeal, 26 August 1997, unreported) The State of Queensland & Anor v J.L. Holdings Pty Limited (1997) 189 CLR 146 Watts v Rake (1960) 108 CLR 158 Purkess v Crittenden (1965) 114 CLR 164 Franklins Self Serve Pty Limited v Wyber (1999) NSWCA 390 Suttor v Gundowda Pty Limited (1950) 81 CLR 418 Coulton v Holcombe (1986) 162 CLR 1 DECISION : (a) Appeal from decision of Master Greenwood dismissed.; (b) Appeal from the decision of Dowd J dismissed.; (c) Appeal from decision of Sinclair DCJ upheld in part.; (d) In lieu of judgment for the respondent in the sum of $412,046 there be judgment for the respondent in the sum of $345,074.25.; (e) The appellant pay the respondent's costs of each appeal.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate