NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court CITATION : Exterior Home Improvements v Stanger [1999] NSWSC 222 CURRENT JURISDICTION : Common Law FILE NUMBER(S) : 12322/98 HEARING DATE(S) : 18 March 1999 JUDGMENT DATE : 23 March 1999
PARTIES : Exterior Home Improvements Pty Limited (Appellant) Bruce Stanger (Respondent) JUDGMENT OF : Studdert J
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Local Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 1302 of 1997 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER : Mr S. Jackson
COUNSEL : S. Winters (Appellant) R. Montgomery (Respondent) SOLICITORS : Rutter Morgan & Co. (Appellant) Stanger & Clarke (Respondent) CATCHWORDS : Stated case; appeal from Local Court; whether findings supported offence under s 52 of the Trade Practices Act; magistrate drew on independent personal knowledge; damages assessed by reference to cost of total replacement; whether any error of law in findings and decision of magistrate Fair Trading Act ACTS CITED : Justices Act Local Courts (Civil Claims) Act Trade Practices Act Azzopardi v Tasman UEB Industries Ltd (1985) 4 NSWLR 139 Bellgrove v Eldridge (1953-54) 90 CLR 613 Burns v Lipman (1974-75) 132 CLR 157 CASES CITED : McWilliam's Wines Pty Ltd v McDonald's System of Australia Pty Ltd (1980) 49 FLR 455 Parkdale Custom Built Furniture Pty Limited v Puxu Pty Limited (1981-82) 149 CLR 191 Taco Co. v Taco Bell Pty Limited (1982) ATPR 40-303 Waltons Stores (Interstate) Limited v Maher (1987-88) 164 CLR 387 Wetherall v Harrison [1976] 1 QB 773 DECISION : See para 43
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate