NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal CITATION : Middleton v Parramatta City Council [1999] NSWCA 469 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 40373/98 HEARING DATE(S) : Written submissions JUDGMENT DATE : 17 December 1999
Jack Middleton (Appellant) PARTIES : v Parramatta City Council (Respondent) JUDGMENT OF : Priestley JA at 1; Stein JA at 1; Fitzgerald JA at 1
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 3388/94 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER : Twigg DCJ
COUNSEL : A: Mr J L Sharpe R: Mr M McCulloch SOLICITORS : A: Steve Masselos & Co R: Phillips Fox CATCHWORDS : Costs DECISION : Appellant pay respondent's costs of the appeal.
THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
CA 40373/98 DC 3388/94
PRIESTLEY JA STEIN JA FITZGERALD JA
FRIDAY 17 DECEMBER 1999 Jack MIDDLETON v PARRAMATTA CITY COUNCIL (No.2)
JUDGMENT ON COSTS
1 THE COURT: This appeal was dismissed on 8 December 1999. 2 The usual order would be that costs follow the event. The appellant opposes that course. 3 Shortly stated, he advanced two reasons. One is that leave to appeal was granted and the other is that he had offered to settle the appeal on the basis that a verdict be entered for the respondent but each party pay his or its own costs. The appellant did not offer to pay the respondent's costs up to that time. 4 It is regrettable that more costs have been thrown away in making these submissions, which are without merit. 5 The appellant must pay the respondent's costs of the appeal. **********
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate