NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : [1999] 107 A Crim R 296
New South Wales Supreme Court CITATION : JD v DPP [1999] NSWSC 878 CURRENT JURISDICTION : Common Law Division FILE NUMBER(S) : 11794 of 1998 HEARING DATE(S) : 09/11/98 JUDGMENT DATE : 2 September 1999
JD (plaintiff) PARTIES : Director of Public Prosecutions (1st defendant) Mr J Williams, Magistrate (2nd defendant) Chief Magistrate of the Local Court of NSW (3rd defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Hidden J at 1
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Local Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER : Mr J Williams
COUNSEL : G Walsh (solicitor) (plaintiff) P Lakatos and W Langley (1st defendant) Greg Walsh & Co (plaintiff) SOLICITORS : Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (1st defendant) Crown Solicitor (3rd defendant) CATCHWORDS : Criminal Law - committal proceedings - order that information be withdrawn and dismissed - misapprehension by magistrate that defendant consented - whether magistrate functus officio - whether defendant could be discharged - power to award costs Justices Act 1902 ACTS CITED : Crimes Act 1900 Criminal Procedure Act 1986 R v Essex Justices, Ex parte Final [1962] 3 All ER 924 Ex parte Kelly; Re Teece (1966) 85 WN(NSW) 151 CASES CITED : Thomas v Bell (1989) 42 ACrim R 318 Reg v Phipps: Ex parte Alton [1964] 2 QB 420 Dargin v Simpson (Studdert J, SC of NSW, unreported, 24 September 1990: affirmed C of A unreported, 7 February 1992) Lay v Cleary (James J, SC of NSW, unreported 23 February 1993) DECISION : Magistrate had power to award costs.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate