NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Supreme Court CITATION : National Engineering v Chilco [1999] NSWSC 1105 CURRENT JURISDICTION : Equity FILE NUMBER(S) : 2259 of 1997 HEARING DATE(S) : 12, 13, 14, 15 October 1999 JUDGMENT DATE : 17 November 1999
National Engineering Pty Ltd (Plaintiff/Cross Defendant) PARTIES : Chilco Enterprises Pty. Ltd. t/as Trojan Contracting (First Defendant/Cross Claimant) Ray Bradbury (Third Defendant) Sean Bradbury (Fourth Defendant) JUDGMENT OF : Windeyer J at 1
COUNSEL : Mr M S Willmott (Plaintiff/Cross Defendant) Mr D J Cochrane with him Mr M.W. Papallo (Defendants/Cross Claimant) SOLICITORS : Haille Paine (Plaintiff/Cross Defendant) Larry Noble & Associates (Defendants/Cross Claimant) CATCHWORDS : CONTRACTS - existence of a contract - whether there was a contract between plaintiff and defendant - termination of contract - termination for breach of conditions - termination for anticipatory breach - whether at date of purported termination defendant unable to comply with contract - repudiation through wrongful termination - acceptance - cross-claim for damages - onus on cross-claimant to show ability to perform ACTS CITED : Trade Practices Act 1974 ss 51AA, 51AB, 51A 52 Bridgewater v Leahy (1998) 194 CLR 457 Blomley v Ryan (1956) 99 CLR 362 CASES CITED : Commercial Bank of Australia Limited v Armadio (1983) 151 CLR 447 Foran v Wight (1989) 168 CLR 385 Sunbird Plaza Pty Limited v Maloney (1988) 166 CLR 245 DECISION :
15 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate