NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : R v Russell Bamblett (Snr) [2000] NSWCCA 464 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60032/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 26 October 2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 7 November 2000
PARTIES : Russell Bamblett (Snr) - Appellant Crown - Respondent JUDGMENT OF : Sheller JA at 1; James J at 59; Dowd J at 60
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 97/61/0170 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Freeman DCJ OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Appellant - C B Craigie/S A Benson Crown - R D Cogswell SC SOLICITORS : Appellant - D J Humphreys Crown - S E O'Connor CATCHWORDS : CRIMINAL LAW - Appeal against conviction - Sexual intercourse with child under 10 - Whether miscarriage of justice - Whether verdict unreasonable - Where no medical evidence because complainant previously sexually abused by another offender - Where inconsistencies in complainant's evidence - Where trial Judge suggested to jury complainant's allegations beyond capacities of child her age - Where no objection raised at trial - Whether misdirection - Criminal Appeal Rules, r 4. LEGISLATION CITED : Criminal Appeal Rules Crimes Act 1900 BRS v The Queen (1997) 191 CLR 275 Davies and Cody v The King (1937) 57 CLR 170 Jones v The Queen (1997) 191 CLR 439 CASES CITED: M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487 R v Abusafiah (1991) 24 NSWLR 531 R v McKnoulty (1995) 77 A CrimR 333 R v RMM (1996) NSWCCA Butterworths Unreported Decisions 8 R v Zammit (1999) NSWCCA 65 DECISION : 1. Appeal allowed; 2. Quash the conviction; 3. Substitute a verdict of acquittal.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate