NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v ATM [2000] NSWCCA 475 revised - 24/11/2000 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 060184/00 HEARING DATE(S) : 20 November 2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 24 November 2000
PARTIES : Regina v ATM JUDGMENT OF : Sully J at 1; Whealy J at 2; Howie J at 3
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 99/21/3116 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Mitchelmore ADCJ OFFICER :
COUNSEL : R.J. Button (Appellant) W.G. Dawe QC (Crown) SOLICITORS : Kremmer Townsend (Appellant) S.E. O'Connor (Crown) CATCHWORDS : Appeal after convictions - convictions unreasonable and unable to be supported - Summing up - directions and warnings on relationship evidence LEGISLATION CITED : Evidence Act 1995 - ss 38, 97, 101 Jones v the Queen (1989) 166 CLR 409 Jones v The Queen (1997) 191 CLR 439 M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487 R v Milat (SC(NSW) Hunt CJ at CL, unreported, 23/4/96) R v Adam (1999) 47 NSWLR 267 R v A.N. [2000] NSWCCA 372 Gipp v The Queen (1998) 194 CLR 106 CASES CITED: R v A.H. (1997) 42 NSWLR 702 R v Beserick (1993) 30 NSWLR 510 R v Fraser (NSW Court of Criminal Appeal, unreported, 10/8/98) R v Greenham [1999] NSWCCA 8 BRS v The Queen (1997) 191 CLR 275 R v R.N.S. [1999] NSWCCA 122 R v Wickham (NSW Court of Criminal Appeal, unreported, 17/12/91) R v Tripodina (1988) 35 A Crim R 183 R v Marsh [2000] NSWCCA 370 DECISION : Appeal allowed. Convictions quashed. Verdicts of acquittal entered on each count.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate