NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (1999) 33 ACSR 307
New South Wales Supreme Court CITATION : Leadenhall Pty Ltd v Peptech Ltd [1999] NSWSC 1180 CURRENT JURISDICTION : Equity Division Commercial List FILE NUMBER(S) : 50080/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 21.10.1999, 22.10.1999, 27.10.1999, 28.10.1999, 29.10.1999, 1.11.1999, 2.11.1999 JUDGMENT DATE : 3 December 1999
PARTIES : Leadenhall Australia Ltd & Advent Investors Pty Ltd & Noble Investments Pty Ltd v Peptech Ltd JUDGMENT OF : Hunter J
COUNSEL : Plaintiff: Mr D J Hammerschlag Mr V F Kerr Defendant: Mr J B Simpkins SOLICITORS : Plaintiff: Aleco Vrisakis Defendant: Clayton Utz CATCHWORDS : Misleading conduct - Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth); s 1005 Corporations Law; s 68 Fair Trading Act 1987; Contract to subscribe for shares and the granting of options in listed corporation; Body of shares in corporation subject to restriction agreements under ch 9 of Listing Rules of Australian Stock Exchange; Existence of shares not known to subscriber of shares; Annual and half yearly reports of corporation omitted references to restricted shares; Wrongly described all of corporation's issued shares as quoted shares; Subscriber misled by conduct of corporation; Whether insider trading; s 1002G(2) Corporations Law; Damages; no causation nexus between misleading conduct and subscriber's losses. Corporations Law ACTS CITED : Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) Potts v Miller (1940) 64 CLR 282 Henjo Investments Pty Ltd v Collins Marrickville Pty Ltd (1988) 79 ALR 83 Mister Figgins Pty Ltd v Centrepoint Freeholds Pty Ltd (1981) 36 ALR 23 Gould v Vaggelas (1985) 157 CLR 215 Neilsen v Hempston Holdings Pty Ltd (1986) 65 ALR 302 CASES CITED : Trade Practices Commission v Collings (1996) 142 ALR 43 Collings Construction v Australian Competition & Consumer Commission (1998) 43 NSWLR 131 Marks v GIO Aust Holdings (1998) 73 ALJR 12 March v Stramare (E. & M.H) Pty Ltd (1991) 171 CLR 506 Medlin v State Government Insurance Commission (1995) 182 CLR 1 Collins Marrickville Pty Ltd v Henjo Investments Pty Ltd (1987) ATPR 40-822 DECISION : Summons dismissed. Plaintiffs ordered to pay defendant's costs.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate