NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal CITATION : R v CRAMPTON [1999] NSWCCA 130 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60502/98 HEARING DATE(S) : 13 May 1999 JUDGMENT DATE : 1 June 1999
REGINA (Crown)
PARTIES : v
Alan James CRAMPTON (Appellant) JUDGMENT OF : Wood CJ at CL at 1; Barr J at 2; Greg James J at 48
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 97/21/0298 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER : Karpin DCJ
PG Berman (Crown) COUNSEL : SJ Odgers (Appellant) CK Smith (Crown) SOLICITORS : MacMahon Associates (Appellant) CATCHWORDS : Criminal Law - sexual offences - failure to complain - whether directions adequate; Criminal Law - sexual offences - two complainants neither of whom corroborated the other - whether Jones v Dunkel direction necessary; Criminal Law - multiple counts - whether necessary to instruct jury that they might take into account a reasonable doubt on one count in deciding any other count R v Johnston, Court of Criminal Appeal 31.7.98 unrep Longman v The Queen (1989) 168 CLR 79 CASES CITED: Jones v The Queen (1997) 149 ALR 598 R v Murray (1987) 11 NSWLR 12 R v Mitchell, Court of Criminal Appeal 5.4.95 unrep DECISION : Appeal dismissed.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEAL
No. 60502/98 WOOD CJ at CL BARR J GREG JAMES J
Tuesday, 1 June 1999 Regina v Alan James CRAMPTON
JUDGMENT
1 WOOD CJ at CL: I have had the advantage of reading in draft the reasons for judgment of Barr J. I agree with his reasons and the orders he proposes. **********
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate