NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Appeal CITATION : Nan v DPP [1999] NSWCA 445 FILE NUMBER(S) : CA 040193/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 25 November 1999 JUDGMENT DATE : 25 November 1999
PARTIES : Appellant- Vasile Nan Respondent- Director of Public Prosecutions JUDGMENT OF : Meagher JA at 1; Handley JA at 4; Fitzgerald JA at 5
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 128/98 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER : Nield J
COUNSEL : Appellant- Vasile Nan - litigant in person Respondent- Mr Lamprati SOLICITORS : Appellant- litigant in person Respondent- Director of Public Prosecutions CATCHWORDS : Disqualification of licence; Failure to convert Queensland driver's licence to NSW driver's licence within three months ACTS CITED : Justices Act DECISION : Dismissed with costs
THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES COURT OF APPEAL
CA 040193/99
MEAGHER JA HANDLEY JA FITZGERALD JA
THURSDAY 25 NOVEMBER 1999 VASILE NAN v DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS & 1 OR. JUDGMENT
1 MEAGHER JA: In this matter on 2 September 1998 at a court in Katoomba a magistrate convicted the claimant, Mr Vasile Nan, of the driving offence of driving without an appropriate licence. He was convicted, fined $500 and disqualified from holding a licence for six months. For various reasons which are not presently relevant Mr Nan was not present at that hearing, however, the matter came to his attention and he filed a notice of appeal to the District Court. That appeal was heard pursuant to s122 of the Justices Act by his Honour Judge Nield. The appeal was dismissed and the conviction was confirmed. 2 The main point which his Honour had to decide in the District Court appeal was whether Mr Nan had at the time of the alleged offence been resident of New South Wales for more than three months. His Honour found that Mr Nan had been so resident and that is why the appeal was dismissed and the conviction confirmed. He was fined $100 and disqualified from holding or obtaining any licence up to and including 23 August 1999 which of course means that the period of disqualification has expired and he is now not disqualified.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate