NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v Joyce [2000] NSWCCA 259 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60415/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 14 June 2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 24 July 2000
PARTIES : REGINA v Norman William JOYCE JUDGMENT OF : Giles JA at 1; Dunford J at 148; Greg James J at 149
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Supreme Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 70127/91 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL Loveday J OFFICER :
COUNSEL : J C Papayanni - Appellant M Grogan - Crown SOLICITORS : Jeffreys & Associates - Appellant S E O'Connor - Crown CATCHWORDS : The appellant was found guilty of two murders. On a petition under s 474B of the Crimes Act 1900, pursuant to s 474C(1)(b) of that Act the case was referred to the Court of Criminal Appeal to be dealt with as an appeal under the Criminal Appeal Act 1912. Whether leave to appeal as to questions of fact or grounds of appeal as to which appropriate objection had not been taken at the trial referred to but not decided: R v Johns (1999) NSWCCA 286 referred to. Numerous grounds of appeal were considered, almost all specific to the facts in the appeal. Pollitt v The Queen (1992) 174 CLR 558 and R v Clough (1992) 64 A Crim R 451 considered in relation to instructing the jury to consider specific matters which could reasonably be regarded as undermining the credibility of a prison informer. Pollitt v The Queen referred to in relation to corroboration where there is a possibility of joint fabrication. Ireland v The Queen (1971) 126 CLR 321 referred to in relation to admissibility of an interviewing police officer's statements to the person being interviewed of his beliefs and opinions. The Court declined to receive further written submissions delivered without leave after judgment was reserved. DECISION : Appeal dismissed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate