NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal CITATION : Regina v Lonie & Groom [1999] NSWCCA 319 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60087/98; 60134/98 HEARING DATE(S) : 11 May 1999 JUDGMENT DATE : 15 October 1999
PARTIES : Regina v John Russell Lonie Regina v Carla Phyllis Groom JUDGMENT OF : Barr J at 1; Greg James J at 2; Smart AJ at 11
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : District Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 97/11/0430 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL OFFICER : McGuire DCJ
Appellant Lonie: R Burgess COUNSEL : Appellant Groom: P Hamill Respondent: R D Ellis SOLICITORS : Appellants: T A Murphy Respondent: C.K. Smith CATCHWORDS : Cultivation of cannabis plantation; Supply of cannabis leaf; setting a device capable of inflicting grievous bodily harm; sufficiency of evidence; warning as to reliability of evidence; corrupt police officer implicating other police in corruption; references to Police Royal Commission; meaning of "suffers or permits"; erroneous directions. Crimes Act 1900 ACTS CITED : Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 Evidence Act 1995 R v Flood [1999] NSWCCA 198 R v Vonarx, CA Vic unrep. 15 November 1995 Gipp v The Queen (1998) 72 ALJR 1012 R v Sanewski [1987] 1 Qd R 374 CASES CITED: R v Siouter (1971) Cr.App.R 403 Broad v Parish (1941) 64 CLR 588 Adelaide Corporation v Australasian Performing Rights Association (1928) 40 CLR 481 R v Horton (1998) 45 NSWLR 426 R v Reid 1999 NSWCCA 258. DECISION : GROOM: Appeal allowed; conviction quashed; verdict of acquittal entered; LONIE: (a) Appeal allowed; convictions quashed on all three counts; (b) Verdict of acquittal entered on count of setting a device capable of inflicting grievous bodily harm on any person with intent to inflict grievous bodily harm.; (c) New trial to be held on the counts of cultivation and supply.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate