NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : [1999] 49 NSWLR 68
New South Wales Supreme Court CITATION : Barbaro & Ors -v- DPP & Anor [1999] NSWSC 1338 revised - 12/09/2000 CURRENT JURISDICTION : FILE NUMBER(S) : SC 11323/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 24/11/99, 25/11/99, 26/11/99 JUDGMENT DATE : 26 November 1999
PARTIES : Pasquale Barbaro; Giuseppe Barbaro and Francesco Catanzariti (Plaintiffs) Director of Public Prosecutions and Commissioner of Police (Defendants) JUDGMENT OF : O'Keefe J at 1
COUNSEL : J. V. Agius S.C. and A. Martin for the Plaintiffs P.I. Lakatos for the Defendants Cater & Blumer, 112-144 Yambil Street, Griffith NSW 2680 Telephone: 069 621 7551 (Plaintiffs) C. Smith, Acting Solicitor for Public Prosecutions SOLICITORS : 265 Castlereagh Street, Sydney NSW 2000 Telephone: 9285-8643 (First Defendant) I.V. Knight Crown Solicitor Level 5, 60-70 Elizabeth Street Sydney NSW 2000 Telephone: 9224 5164 (Second Defendant) CATCHWORDS : Criminal Law ; Evidence; Listening Devices; Warrants; Contents of warrant; Meaning of "shall specify", "use", "premises on which", "place at which"; Period of warrant; Validity of listening device warrants ACTS CITED : Listening Devices Act, 1984 S.5, Part 4, S.16 (1), (4), (6A), S.16(4), Schedule 2 Ousley v The Queen (1997) 192 CLR 69 CASES CITED : Inland Revenue Commissioners v Rossminster Limited (1980) AC 952 Haynes v Attorney General (NSW) Supreme Court of NSW, 9 February, 1996, James J unreported DECISION : Declaration as to invalidity of one warrant;; Defendant to pay half Plaintiff's costs
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate