NSW Caselaw
New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal
CITATION : Regina v Dhanhoa [2000] NSWCCA 257 FILE NUMBER(S) : CCA 60644/99 HEARING DATE(S) : 18 April 2000 JUDGMENT DATE : 20 July 2000
PARTIES : Regina v Kamaljeet Raju Dhanhoa JUDGMENT OF : Priestley JA at 1; Foster AJA at 48; Sperling J at 49
LOWER COURT JURISDICTION : Supreme Court LOWER COURT FILE NUMBER(S) : 97/31/0459 LOWER COURT JUDICIAL His Honour Judge Viney QC OFFICER :
COUNSEL : Crown - M.C. Marien Respondent - T.A. Game SC SOLICITORS : Crown - S.E. O'Connor Respondent - T.A. Murphy CATCHWORDS : Crown appeal against sentence - (by majority) no error of principle by sentencing judge - sentence not so inadequate, bearing double jeopardy principle in mind, as to warrant interference on appeal Crimes Act 1900 LEGISLATION CITED : Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 Sentencing Act 1989 R v Francesco Barbara (CCA, 24/2/97) R v Carrion [200] NSWCCA 191 R v Hampton (CCA 25/6/98) R v Jaworowski [1999] NSWCCA 430 R v Jurisic (1998) 45 NSWLR 208 R v Mcdonald (CCA 12/10/98) R v Mansour [1999] NSWCCA 180 CASES CITED: R v Phelan (1993) 66 A Crim R 446 R v Robinson [200] NSWCCA 182 R v Rose (CCA 23/5/96) R v Smith (1987) 44 SASR 587 R v Tait and Bartley (1979) 24 ALR 473 R v Turner (CCA, 12/8/91) R v Winchester (1992) 58 A Crim R 345 R v Wright (1997) 93 A Crim R 48 DECISION : Appeal dismissed.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate